Jonas Berg Team teamMAP

Four of the seven people here sit in Curious (57%), which sets the tone for how this group approaches work before it begins. They are drawn to new ideas and untried options, but they test those ideas privately first and extend trust at their own pace. The remaining three people spread across Steady (14%, 1 person), Thoughtful (14%, 1 person), and Imaginative (14%, 1 person). Steady and Thoughtful both sit on the more guarded, task-first side of the group, reinforcing the pattern of careful, independent thinking that Curious also carries. Imaginative sits on the open, collaborative side, bringing a preference for generating ideas collectively rather than privately.

What this energises is a team that takes creative thinking seriously without rushing into it. There is appetite for fresh approaches and worthwhile risks, but the group tends to want some structure around that exploration - clear enough guidelines to make the range feel safe rather than exposed.

The watch-for: if pressure to innovate arrives without adequate structure or support behind it, the majority of this team is likely to find that draining rather than motivating.

Six of the seven people here sit in the reflective half of the decision axis, and that shapes how this team moves. Precise (43%, 3 people), Measured (29%, 2 people), and Prepared (14%, 1 person) together account for 86% of the team - all three sitting in that left column, all sharing a preference for reasoning before committing. The remaining 14% (1 person) sits in Driven, where decisions are taken lightly and momentum does the work.

What that 86% share energises is a team that thinks before it acts. Decisions here tend to be grounded, and work tends to leave in good shape. The difference within that band is in delivery: Precise finishes to a high standard and holds the work there; Measured stays flexible on method once the call is made; Prepared loads the care up front and then moves at pace once the green light arrives.

The one person in Driven brings a different pull - toward forward motion, practical results, and resolving grey areas by acting rather than waiting.

No single area leads here. The spread itself is the finding: a team that is predominantly deliberate in how it decides, varied in how it delivers, with one voice that is drawn toward keeping things moving.

The majority of this team - 57% (4 people) - sit in Selective. They think wide and decide narrow: ideas come freely, novel angles and untried routes all get a hearing, and then the decision that follows is careful and reasoned, wanting genuine certainty before anything is committed to. That combination gives the team real generative range without recklessness. The remaining three people are spread evenly: 14% (1 person) each in Methodical, Analytical, and Exploratory. The Methodical person maps thoroughly before moving; the Analytical person trials approaches before committing; the Exploratory person reaches for new angles while bringing gut feel into the choices along the way.

What this energises is a team that can hold a lot of options open without losing rigour at the point of decision. Ideas are taken seriously on their own terms before being tested against reality.

The watch-for, given how many people sit in Selective, is the brainstorm where the answer was already fixed before the room opened up. When wide thinking is invited but the selection process is performative, that drains the people who do their best work in the gap between generating and deciding.

Six of the seven people here sit in the left column of the grid - Independent at 43% (3 people), Consistent at 14% (1 person), and Inventive at 29% (2 people) - with the remaining person in Cooperative at 14%. That left-column weight means this is a group that works largely from its own resources. People carry their own load, set their own standards, and do not need much from others to get things done.

What that produces is a team that delivers without a great deal of coordination overhead. The Independent and Consistent areas bring thoroughness and reliability; the Inventive area brings a readiness to start new things and follow the shape of an idea. The single person in Cooperative holds a different balance, carrying effort jointly and adjusting between precision and pragmatism as the work demands.

The spread itself is worth holding in mind. No single area leads. Three distinct working styles sit across that left column, and they share a preference for self-reliance while differing on how they approach detail, rhythm, and originality. The Cooperative presence adds a thread of joint effort that the rest of the group does not pull toward as strongly. That range is the finding here.

Five of the seven people here sit in Cautious (71%), and the picture that creates is consistent: trust is extended slowly, positions are worked out independently, and a yes arrives only when the reasoning is solid. Agreement is not withheld out of stubbornness - it is simply not given until the ground has been checked. The remaining two people are split between Patient (14%, 1 person) and Considered (14%, 1 person). Patient shares the guarded starting point but can be brought round when the argument holds up over time. Considered reaches decisions through genuine discussion, with positions reasoned out in the open rather than settled privately first. Both sit close enough to the centre of gravity that the dominant tone of the team is still one of deliberate, evidence-led commitment. What this energises is rigour: when this team agrees, the agreement is durable. The watch-for is pace. Environments that prioritise speed over careful consideration will put pressure on the majority here, and the quality of their commitment depends on having enough time to reach it properly.

Five of the seven areas on this map have no one in them. The people here have gathered into four corners, and 71% of them - five of the seven - sit in the right column: Creative (14%, 1 person), Tenacious (29%, 2 people), and Daring (29%, 2 people). That column is drawn toward bold, flexible thinking, and the doing that goes with it tends to be broad, practical, and willing to adapt route as the work demands. New ideas get followed all the way to delivery here, and genuinely untried directions are taken deliberately rather than reluctantly.

The remaining two people sit on the left: Rigorous (14%, 1 person), where plans follow proven routes and the delivery matches the drawing, and Meticulous (14%, 1 person), where the route stays open but the finish is held to a high standard. Both of those positions value structure and exactness in ways the right column does not pull toward as strongly.

The spread itself is the finding. This is not a team with a shared instinct about how plans become finished work. The distance between Daring and Rigorous is about as wide as this map allows, and the team contains both.