Sariio Example teamMAP

The centre of gravity here sits in the middle columns of the grid, pulled slightly toward the analytical end. No single area leads, but the two largest, Organised at 28% (5 people) and Versatile at 22% (4 people), both occupy the middle ground on the relationship axis, and together they account for just under half the group. Organised brings a preference for clear procedures and collaborative structure; Versatile moves between established approaches and fresh ones as the situation asks. Steady at 11% (2 people) and Open at 11% (2 people) sit at opposite corners of that same band - Steady drawn toward proven methods and self-reliance, Open toward talking things through and keeping options live. The remaining 28% sits across Thoughtful, Curious, Imaginative, Purposeful and Spirited, each at 6% (1 person), spread across the outer areas of the grid. What this means in practice is that the group does not move as one. The pull toward structure and method is real, but it is not dominant, and the spread across the grid means people are likely starting from genuinely different places when work begins.

The majority of this team is drawn toward gut-led decisions and flexible delivery. Agile leads at 28% (5 people), and the areas around it - Assured at 17% (3 people), Bold at 17% (3 people), Driven at 11% (2 people), and Responsive at 11% (2 people) - all sit on the same side of the map. Together they describe a team that moves on instinct, adjusts as things develop, and values getting something useful out over getting something perfect. Prepared accounts for 11% (2 people), bringing careful groundwork before a fast release. The remaining 6% sits across Precise (1 person).

What this energises is real momentum. Incomplete pictures do not stall things here. People read what is in front of them and act, and the team tends to gather pace rather than wait for certainty.

The one thing worth watching: Agile at 28% is the largest single group, and what drains that area is plans enforced after the situation has moved on. When the team has already adjusted to new circumstances, holding them to an earlier plan is likely to create friction rather than discipline.

Sixty-one percent of people here - Primed at 28% (5 people), Decisive at 22% (4 people), and Pioneering at 11% (2 people) - sit in the same band: they do their thinking, however they do it, and then they decide without hesitation. The preparation varies across those three areas, but the decisiveness does not. That gives the team a strong forward pull. Questions tend to get answered rather than deferred, and momentum is rarely lost to indecision.

Below that band, Structured at 11% (2 people) and Pragmatic at 11% (2 people) bring a different rhythm - both are comfortable adjusting as they go, one within a clear framework, the other with fewer fixed rails. The remaining 17% sits across Methodical, Analytical and Selective, at 6% (1 person) each, where the pull is toward careful reasoning before any commitment is made.

No single area leads. What the spread shows is a team where the majority are drawn toward acting on a decision once it is reached, while a meaningful minority are drawn toward working things through more fully before they move. Both are present, and both are doing real work in how this group operates.

The largest share of this team sits in Cooperative, at 28% (5 people). That is the clearest signal here: effort carried jointly, trust and task given roughly equal weight, delivery adjusting between precision and pragmatism as the work demands. Alongside that, 17% (3 people) sit in Resourceful and another 17% (3 people) in Energetic - both people-oriented, both drawn toward practical output and new approaches over polished ones. Independent and Exacting each hold 11% (2 people), bringing a counterweight: self-sufficient, detail-held, standards maintained. The remaining 17% sits across Consistent, Inventive and Available.

What this energises is a team that can carry work collectively without losing the thread of quality. The Cooperative centre means most people here are comfortable holding both the relationship and the task at once, and the spread into Resourceful and Energetic means there is appetite for practical, people-driven momentum.

The watch-for from Cooperative: this group finds highly volatile conditions draining. Constant reprioritisation or environments where the ground keeps shifting will wear at the people who form the core of how this team delivers.

The largest share of this team, 33% (6 people), sits in Perceptive - drawn toward gut feel and social attunement, forming commitment with the current rather than waiting for it to settle. Close behind, 22% (4 people) sit in Instinctive, arriving at conviction independently and quickly, without needing the group's agreement first. Together those two areas account for more than half the team, and they give the group a general readiness to move. The 17% (3 people) in Accommodating bring a different quality - positions that shift to make room for others, decisions reached by mutual adjustment. The 11% (2 people) in Nurturing take more time, gathering people's views and reasoning carefully before anything is settled. The remaining 17% (3 people) sits across Considered, Empathic and Passionate.

What this energises is a team that can form commitment without long deliberation, and that tends to stay attuned to how people are responding as things develop.

The watch-for, given that Perceptive leads: when priorities shift or tasks are constantly re-ordered, the people in that area find it draining rather than energising. Stability in what the team is working toward matters more here than it might appear on the surface.

The centre of gravity here sits in the left and middle columns of the grid, though no single area leads and no band holds a clear majority. Ready draws the largest share at 22% (4 people), where thorough preparation up front allows delivery to flex on the detail. Persistent and Experimental each account for 17% (3 people each) - Persistent keeping things moving steadily through a mix of the proven and the new, Experimental treating the work itself as the test bed. Rigorous, Composed, and Daring each sit at 11% (2 people each), covering the remaining spread from disciplined end-to-end precision through to genuinely open-ended, untried directions. The remaining 11% sits across Meticulous and Creative.

What this spread means in practice is that the team carries real range. Some people want the route mapped before they move; others are still adjusting the plan as they go. Some hold work to a precise standard before it leaves; others are satisfied once it is practical and moving. That breadth can serve the team well, and it also means that assumptions about how work should be done - how much planning is enough, what counts as finished - are worth making explicit rather than leaving to chance.